Auction Help
|
By
Tyler
Jones |
| Sniper
Lite |
These
myths question Snipers committement and desire for the
item |
| 6.1 |
Early bidders
are more committed to the item than snipers. Snipers win
items from people who want it more and deserve it more
than they do.
Direct from the land of small price. |
Judging
who deserves the item more is hard to do. Why should any
one person be more deserving of getting something than
somebody else?
Should the poorest person get the item? The oldest? The
youngest? The person who's a member of an ethnic minority?
The person who was abused most as a child? I mean no disrespect
to anybody who may fall in these groups. Poverty, child
abuse and racial oppression are terrible things and I
oppose them vigorously. Instead, I use them to illustrate
that these kinds of rules would cause all sorts of problems.
Should we not have bidding, and just have an eBay committe
read everybody's sob story, and simply award each item
to the person who, in their view, is the most deserving?
Besides, the timing of the bid has nothing to do with
how much somebody wants it. Maybe the sniper happened
across the item at the last minute, or maybe the sniper
knew about the item for days and spent his time researching
it to determine the amount of his proxy bid.
The only objective measure we have is that of the all
mighty dollar. Whoever is willing to pay the most for
each item wins. Fair and Square. |
| 6.2 |
Snipers
don't have a sense of community. They don't care for eBay
or other bidders. They only want to ruin things for everybody.
|
Oh, this
one hurts! . The sense of community on eBay is apparant
on the chat boards. People talk about their lives, share
stories, ask questions and give and receive help. Most
people on the chat boards are very friendly and snipers
go out of their way to be friendly and helpful, except
when the same complaints about them keep coming up.
When it comes time to bid on auctions, however, all bets
are off. When I'm bidding on something, I'm not anybody's
friend. I want to win the item, and I don't care who else
is bidding on it. Let's suppose that dr.gizmonic, englandboy,
tiptie and myself (we're all legendary snipers) are all
bidding on the same item. Normally, nobody would know
about this, but suppose that we somehow tipped our hand,
and revealed our intentions.
There would be no love lost. We would all still want the
item, and bid the highest we could to win. None of us
would ask or give quarter. This myth is basically asking
snipers to "take one for the team". That is, we should
lose on purpose to make other people feel good. I can
turn this around easily and ask why can't the anti-snipers
lose on purpose and make ME feel good?
In some ways, it's like the National Football League.
Many players on opposing teams are good friends. They
work charities together, help disadvantaged youth, go
on speaking tours together, and so on. However, once they
get on the football field, it's war. Their only goal is
to win ball games, and if that means making their best
friend lose, so be it.
eBay is a community and snipers are a very important part
of that community. We really are friendly and helpful.
Just don't expect that to extend to the auction pages.
|
| 6.3 |
Snipers
ignore the auctions and do not participate at all until
the very end. |
Snipers
are in fact VERY involved in the auction the minute
they see it and want it. While lowballers are furiously
beating each other's brains out in meaningless bidding
wars, the sniper is researching the item, checking it
out, asking the seller questions and determining their
TRUE MAX BID. Just because you can't see the sniper
doesn't mean he's not there. He's not bidding as soon
as he sees the item, but that's irrelevant since you should
not bid until you get all the information you can.
I suspect that the root cause of this myth is that people
view bidding as the only activity possible regarding an
auction. To them, it makes no sense not to bid as soon
as you see the item. Also, they assume that anybody who
doesn't show their hand as early as possible must not
exist. |
|
|
|